Project Team

BuildingEnergy 16 Full Conference Green Company Manager Member

BuildingEnergy 16 Full Conference Green Company Manager Member

Mary Kraus is a principal of Kraus-Fitch Architects, Inc., a firm specializing in sustainable design and internationally recognized for its work with cohousing communities. She uses a participatory process to help large client groups reach consensus on design decisions. She emphasizes a common-sense approach to ecological architecture, including strategies that dovetail well with affordability. She has served on the boards of the Cohousing Network and the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association. Her work has been featured in green design books and on national television, and she was named one of the “Top Ten Green Architects of 2005” by Natural Home and Garden magazine. Mary lives at Pioneer Valley Cohousing, the first cohousing community to be completed on the east coast (in 1994); her daily experience living in her ecologically-designed neighborhood lends inspiration to her work with sustainable development.

Architect

BuildingEnergy 16 Full Conference Member

BuildingEnergy 16 Full Conference Member

Marc Rosenbaum, of South Mountain Company is well known in NESEA circles as one who never lets ignorance stand in the way of expressing a firmly held opinion. He is a long time student of making good buildings and continues to be amazed that his clients put up with him.

Energy Consultant

Other Team Members

Center for Ecological Technology - air sealing
Northeast Solar - PV design & installation, solar hot water renovations

Ratings, Awards and Recognition

Published References:

Essay about the ZNE renovation published in Earth Matters book, Levellers Press: https://store.collectivecopies.com/store/show/6
Two essays (including the one above) published in Earth Matters series, Daily Hampshire Gazette, Northampton, MA (http://www.gazettenet.com/)

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:

One barrier to broader adoption of ZNE practice is the perception of ZNE as expensive and exotic.  In this project we addressed this issue directly, demonstrating that ZNE renovation can be straightforward and practicable, providing qualitative improvements, significant savings in energy and carbon emissions, and excellent return on investment.  We started with our small, simple, relatively efficient, sun-tempered home, our half of a cohousing duplex built in 1994.  What would it take to make it ZNE?  Answer:  Much less than I had anticipated – and nothing fancy.

 

Our home was built “Energy Crafted”, with 7” dense-packed cellulose walls and tight construction.  Our windows were reasonably good for the time – double-pane, argon-filled, low-e casements.  A sealed-combustion propane-fired boiler provided heat and hot water.  An exhaust-only ventilation system kept the air fresh.  Most of the lighting was CFL.  The design was compact and sunny, providing a comfortable living space with three bedrooms in about 1,000 square feet of finished area (1,596 SF conditioned space.)  A solar hot water system, installed on our roof in 1999, was shared with our duplex-mates.  Before our ZNE renovation, our electricity use averaged 300 kwh/month; yearly propane usage was about 300 gallons.  A good starting point, but nothing spectacular.

 

The first step on our ZNE journey followed one of my favorite sustainable design maxims, “Don’t overlook the mundane”:  we bought a new refrigerator, saving an estimated 40 kwh per month.  Our path to a ZNE home included:

 

·         Careful modeling to determine strategies

·         Targeted air sealing (start with a sound envelope!)

·         Reducing plug loads

·         New air-source heat pump to replace propane boiler

·         New HRV to replace exhaust-only ventilation

·         Super-insulated electric water tank as new backup for solar hot water

·         5.9 kw PV array to cover all energy uses

 

With PVs now powering all systems – and in spite of a record-breaking winter – our home was net energy producing the first year:  430 kwh net annual production (1.2 kwh/day, 6.5% above load).  With all of this in place, our household energy use declined by 23% (using kwh equivalents for the replaced propane).  

Quick Facts

General

Location Amherst, MA
Building Type One side of residential duplex
Project Type Zero Energy
Basis of Performance Claim Verified
Bedrooms 3
Bathrooms 1.0
Conditioned Floor Area 1,200 sq ft
Total Cost of Project $62,100

Energy Summary

Energy Data Type Verified
Renewable Energy System Type(s) Photovoltaics
Ratings
Net electricity usage (purchased) 431 kWh/year
Annual renewable energy generated 7,023 kWh/year

Envelope and Mechanicals

Subslab assembly

1" XPS

Foundation wall assembly

8" poured concrete wall with interior insulation.
Most locations: interior stud wall with 6" fiberglass (R-17)
Tight locations (e.g., stairwell): 2" XPS (R-10)
Note: Foundation R-value noted below is approximate weighted average.

Above grade wall assembly

7” dense-packed cellulose
2x6 stud wall with 2x3 strapping for thermal break

Door Assembly

Existing insulated steel doors (Therma-Tru?)
One with full window, R-3.2
One with half window, R-5