Thoughts about the two new NESEA "coordinators"

It was heartening to see NESEA seeking candidates for two positions that I have always considered central to the success of our community and the organization that supports us. Having thought (and fought) hard about both membership and communication for over two decades I’d like to catch up with this favorable moment and offer my perspective on the prospect of establishing and growing these positions.

Let me say first that I consider NESEA at its heart a community of committed professionals. Membership in this community has two essential characters. There are those, that I call “the tribe”, who consider their association and alignment with NESEA’s purpose essential to their professional identity – we are “NESEA people” and we share a common understanding of ideas and practices that we have learned and developed together over many years. These are the folks who plan and present at our conferences and events or who gather over lunch or meet in the halls at a conference to discuss and debate what we are learning together. These are the folks who form our chapters and spend countless hours planning for and convening their local NESEA community. We know these folks because they have found a way in. What we need are more diverse, line of sight points of entry to “the tribe”, especially for those in the second category.

This other set of NESEA members are those who “choose” their membership because the conference fee discount is structured to assure that “choice.” While this strategy assures a high membership rate for the organization it offers a fairly poor toehold for those members to value their membership in or commitment to NESEA, and certainly offers no invitation to become involved or more fully engaged. Some of these members will drink the Kool-Aid, make connections, and discover a route to join the tribe, and most of these “members” probably value the NESEA experience, but this (otherwise shallow) membership strategy needs to provide a more deliberate and conscious opportunity for potential members to actively choose to be part of our community and recognize how they might participate with their peers. It looks like now we will have somebody in a dedicated staff position to pay attention to this need. Hooray!

A robust membership strategy is really a community strategy. It includes that initial point of entry, which we might call recruitment, and follows that immediately with a process of orientation (what I am suggesting is absent in my comment above). When defined as a membership strategy, the next phase is retention, which to my mind runs the risk of focusing on a the narrow metric of number of members. If instead the Membership Coordinator were to understand their role as “Community Coordinator” membership alone is no longer the measure of success. Instead the Community Coordinator recognizes that membership is a starting point for an arc of participation over many years in potentially many roles, both active and passive, all thoughtfully structured and organizationally supported to assure that the experience is always vital, fulfilling, and meaningfully contributes to professional growth and contribution. I would call this ongoing phase of member coordination “development.” I have previously recommended Amy Jo Kim’s useful description of this as the “social scaffolding” that can be recognized in any robust and active community. I see hints at this in the job description and am hoping to infer that this role aspires toward this larger purpose.

Communication. Now there is a word! I am confident that, with Mitch Anthony as our partner, there is a discipline about messages and audiences and ambitions that recognizes the determination and persistence, the resources and strategic alignment, and the relentless focus that the scale of campaigns (and I expect there will be many) require. I have been admiring the judicious pace that our new generation of leadership has employed; consistent and patient progress is leading us step by step in what sure feels like a common direction. What a relief!

Effective communication requires skill and too often assumes that messages sent are messages received, messages conceived are messages desired, relationships established are relationships sustained, who we think we are is who others say we are, and that what we do is what actually matters to an intended audience. In other words, as emblazoned over the door of design legend Milton Glaser’s office: “Art is Work”.

My hope is that NESEA’s new Communication Coordinator is wise to all of this. I especially hope that they recognize that internal audiences are as important as external ones. In this case both our member community and its organizational staff are as essential audiences as those in the circles radiating out from this internal constituency. We are the ones with the most immediate fascination and interest in who NESEA is, what it does, and why that matters. The song we sing to the world about that needs a good beat and solid harmony.

“If you practice sustainability, this is where you belong.” I consider this the fundamental value proposition of the organization. It’s result (exemplified by the character and output of our membership) is our point of differentiation and exceptional credibility: “Our members consistently set the highest standards for advancing scrupulous practice.” We are, and have been for nearly four decades, devoted to developing a robust and responsible energy economy and proving it can be done by doing it. I’m looking forward to that message reverberating within and without the organization.

Finally, I am pleased to see these positions characterized as “coordinating” rather than “managing” these two activities. For me it is more than a semantic distinction. A manager takes control. A coordinator assures that a system is engaged to succeed, not always by achieving the ends themselves, but by making certain that everyone who can contribute to that success is involved and organized with others to achieve shared goals. I hope the new hires will act accordingly.

Its been a long journey to reach this new edge. There was a lot of bushwhacking, wandering down rabbit trails, steep climbs and hard weather to endure to get here. I feel like we have reached the shore and are launching a solid vessel across new waters. Its good to see our new captains assemble the needed crew. Here’s to the next stage of this remarkably important journey.

Thanks!

Jamie Wolf / Wolfworks Inc.

Help wanted from NESEA community – anyone w/experience building justa stoves or composting toilets?

I would love to direct anyone within NESEA’s resources to help with the following email I just received:

…Georganne Greene and I took a group to Nicaragua in February and built an earthbag house (I’ll send you a link to the video we made about it). It was an amazing experience! We’re going back in June, but know we can’t build an earthbag house during the rainy season, so we’re exploring rainy season projects. The project we’re most interested in is building justa stoves, to reduce air pollution from smoke in general and the impact of breathing smoke on the families we’re working with specifically, as well as to reduce the amount of wood that needs to be used in cooking.

As a change of pace from our last project, we thought if we actually built one of these stoves with someone with experience at it before we left, we’d be better prepared when we got there. We’ve found materials online about how to build these stoves and information about people who are building these stoves in other parts of the country or the world, but haven’t found anyone in New England. Could you reach out to your contacts to see if anyone knows of someone that could help us out?

The other project we’d really like to work on is building composting toilets, to reduce the amount of raw sewage going into Lake Nicaragua. We haven’t been able to find a good model for this–the two options we’ve found are buying composting toilets or creating one that’s basically building a wooden box around a 10 gallon bucket. We can’t afford the former and don’t think the latter would be acceptable to the population. If you know of anyone who has developed a good model for this, that would be really exciting.

Thanks for any help you can provide!
Julie

Thanks for your help!

Marc

Marc Sternick, AIA, LEED AP
Vice President, Senior Project Architect
Dietz & Company Architects, Inc.

How do we capture the energy of BE? An invitation to dialog.

Dear BE11 attendees and NESEA community,

Re-entry after BuildingEnergy is always hard, and this year was no exception. The energy level at this gathering is so high! It was especially bittersweet to leave the Seaport last week knowing that I may have to wait an entire year to get my “hit” of the passion, the energy, the community that is BE. BE left me wanting more.

That leads to big questions, and I’d like to ask for your input. How do we bottle this stuff? How do we transform BuildingEnergy from a 3-day event each year into an experience that infuses us with ideas, connection and passion throughout the year? And what are the things we would bottle if we could?

Here just two of the many things on my list:

I’d like to find a way to bottle the feeling I had after the “Women of Green” second plenary session, which ended with a spontaneous standing ovation. In my mind, this pecha kucha session was one of the best at BE, and probably one of the best learning sessions I have ever been a part of — largely because of our 8 panelists’ willingness to share very personal stories in the interest of our collective of our learning. Some of the highest praise for the event came from some of our most technically focused members — mostly men. I think that all who attended appreciated the huge contrast between this session and the other, much more cerebral offerings at the conference. And the buzz continued, after the conference, with commitments via email from the panelists to stay in touch, to serve as resources to one another, and to find another opportunity to rekindle the connections that were born at BE. So how do we do this? What is the best way to maintain this energy throughout the year? How do we continue to involve this incredibly accomplished group of sustainable energy professionals, and widen the circle to include more?

I’d like to bottle the sentiments some of our most active NESEA members used to describe NESEA as they were being filmed by our sponsor, Roger Sorkin, for our soon-to-be released promotional video. Their comments about what NESEA is and why it matters left me with chills. We couldn’t have chosen more appropriate words had we hand-picked them — words like “community,” “family,” “mind-expanding,” “caring,” “interconnectedness.” So these words describe human needs — human needs that can’t possibly be fulfilled through just 3 days each year. What should we be doing to foster this community, this mind expansion, this connectedness?

I wonder if any of the rest of you are feeling similarly? What moments of BE magic did you experience last week? Do you have a desire to replicate them at other times throughout the year? Most importantly, do you have ideas on how to do so?

How can NESEA use the energy of BE to connect us to each other and to ideas throughout the whole year? Comment here, or if you’re more comfortable email me directly at jmarrapese@nesea.org.

Jennifer

Raising community while raising funds: Emerging professionals show us how it's done

Things have that crazy, breathless feeling as we close in on BuildingEnergy, with only 4 weeks to go until showtime. But I wanted to share with you a spontaneous outpouring of generosity that occurred within the NESEA community within the past week.

A group of NESEA emerging professionals, led by Ryan Lacey, LEED AP, of Petersen Engineering, and Bernice Radle, of Buffalo Energy, were working hard to make the NESEA student design competition, which culminates at BE11, a success. Part of their work entailed securing sponsorships and/or donations for prizes for the winners – something they had hoped to be able to offer, but that wasn’t in the budget. The put out a call for help on Basecamp, NESEA’s project planning forum.

What followed was a stunning online fund drive that would make even National Public Radio affiliates green with envy. During the course of the next 3-4 hours, individual NESEA members pledged anywhere from $50 to $250.01, and in no time, they had raised the $2000 they sought. But more importantly, they established their credibility within the NESEA community such that these donors really felt it a privilege to help them.

Kudos to these young leaders. They’re already doing great things, and with their engagement, our future looks bright indeed!

Q & A with Kate Goldstein, NESEA member and Emerging Professional

Kate Goldstein, NESEA member, BE11 Planning Committee Member and current PhD candidate in engineering at MIT

Today we’re talking to Kate Goldstein, a young NESEA member from Providence, RI, and a PhD candidate at MIT, about how she came to be involved with the organization and what NESEA has meant to her professionally and personally. This is part one of a two part conversation with Kate (pictured, right). In part two, she’ll talk about her efforts on behalf of Emerging Professionals at the BuildingEnergy Conference.

As always, we hope these Q & As will provide you with some insights about what you can expect from this year’s conference and the people who are making it happen.

Q: What are you studying at MIT, Kate?
A: Very broadly I study energy in buildings. I am in the Building Technology graduate program which is housed in the architecture department but is essentially a cross between a traditional mechanical engineering and architectural engineering department. Most of my class-work, and the core of my research, is in heat transfer and fluid mechanics.

Q: How did you first come to know about/hear about NESEA?
A: My earliest email concerning NESEA is dated early March of 2008, which was right before the BuildingEnergy Conference during my junior year of college at Brown University. Kurt Teichert introduced me to NESEA, and the NESEA community.

Kurt is a professor at Brown in the Environmental Studies department, and he was the first person to get me passionate about energy in buildings. I am actually quite indebted to him, since when I entered his classroom I wasn’t quite sure where I was going or where I belonged. Kurt always stresses to his students the importance of developing relationships within the field. He strongly encourages networking and grounding oneself in the community around what you do. In my couple of semesters with him at Brown I attended two BuildingEnergy conferences and one Greenbuild conference and met a wide network of local community members in Providence who were really implementing what we talked about it the classroom.

Q: What are you gaining from your association with NESEA?
A: That’s a pretty loaded question and the simplest answer is that NESEA makes me really happy. I am on the planning committee for the BuildingEnergy Conference and I can honestly say that I have not regretted one moment of time I have spent there. I have had the opportunity to meet the best and brightest and funniest and warmest in the field from all over the Northeast. I have been given the great gift of feeling appreciated; whatever I do for NESEA, large or small, I am thanked by a network from NESEA staff to architects, engineers, builders, business people, and so many more. This is one of the most gratifying feelings as my everyday life is fairly stressful, and research is a long road that requires a lot of patience and a lot of tolerance for confusion. I get whatever I give at NESEA. I can’t say that about any other organization for which I’ve worked.

Q: You wrote an article for Northeast Sun recently. What made you decide to write it, and what was it about?
A: I wrote the article because of what I saw personally in the field, and what I heard talked about time and again at NESEA: the great barrier in communication between architects and engineers. At the time, I was living with and dating an architect, and we were thus living the “crossing of the streams”. I thought I could offer an interesting perspective about the importance of giving all you had to making things work. From learning to listen, to learning to be patient, to learning to be able to see the world through someone else’s eyes.

I think the Sun is a great magazine, but I would really love to see more personal essays and articles within it so that the rest of NESEA can be exposed to the amazing people I have the opportunity to work with and talk to every day.

(In part two next Wednesday, Kate talks about Emerging Professionals at the BuildingEnergy Conference.)

More news on the chapter re-design process

Last week we announced a new chapter structure for NESEA, and invited current NESEA chapters to work with us to iron out the particulars. This chapter restructuring is truly taking on a life of its own. I can hardly believe how much has happened since then – all good stuff, all worth sharing!

• Yesterday, we received our first, formal written response from a current NESEA chapter. The Board of GreenHome NYC indicated that they are interested in working with us to further design the ideal NESEA chapter. Per Andy Padian, who serves on their board, “Of course, New Yorkers always want to scream out “we’re #1” and this week, we can claim being the first (we think) existing Chapter to stay in the fold. Do we win anything?” We’ll have to see if we can come up with a suitable prize for those Yankees fans, but in the meantime, my undying gratitude to them for stepping up to the plate will have to suffice. We also have inklings from a few other current NESEA chapters that they’d like to work with us to design the ideal chapter and opt into the new structure – although no more formal commitments yet.
• We have received almost universally favorable comments about the proposal – even from those who are not sure they want to opt in. Some chapters have indicated that they are interested in having NESEA provide some sort of chapter programming each year – say a workshop or seminar – and that they would gladly trade some of their chapter dues share for such programming. We have learned that some of our chapters are reinvesting some of the dues share money they receive from NESEA in “the mother ship” – purchasing NESEA memberships in lieu of an honorarium for their guest speakers. And we have learned that we may need to do a better job of articulating the “WIIFM” (“What’s in it for me?”) to the chapters. If we are asking them to make changes that take more time and cost more money, they’ll need to know what these additional costs buy them in return.
• The proposal also has sparked comments from NESEA members who are not currently involved with a chapter have also shared ideas with respect to how to increase the value of NESEA membership, how to more readily connect NESEA members to each other directly – through pot lucks, house parties, and an online, member-to-member directory.
• Late last week, we received an inquiry from a professional in the Poughkeepsie, NY area who is interested in starting a new NESEA chapter. We filled him in on the chapter redesign process, and he’s very excited about participating in this process from the ground floor.
• I have been asked to share We have been asked to share this open and collaborative process, and our results so far, at the annual conference of our parent organization, the American Solar Energy Society (ASES), in May. Evidently, others in sustainable energy are interested in learning about how we are engaging the NESEA community with respect to these issues, and we are delighted to share what we’re learning!

So what’s next? In January and February we plan to start meeting with those chapters who have expressed interest in fleshing out the new chapter structure to get their perspective on exactly what the new structure should look like, and how and when to roll it out to best serve them. We will also likely create some sort of forum at BuildingEnergy11 so that chapters, NESEA members, and the sustainable energy community at large can weigh in with their ideas. Once we’ve gathered feedback from all the stakeholders, we will present a clearer proposal and roadmap to the NESEA Membership and Chapters Advisory Committee, and ultimately to the NESEA Board for their consideration at the May Board meeting.

As excited as I am to move ahead with all this, I recognize these are big changes we’re making, and big changes take time. And, of course, these changes are occurring in the context of a whole system, a system in which we face competing priorities every day. We’ve opened the spigot, and the ideas with respect to chapters and membership are flowing much faster than we can process them all, especially as we are trying to deal with a server that crashed earlier this week, and with making BuildingEnergy11 our best conference ever. Nonetheless, I’m looking forward to sharing our progress, and hearing your thoughts

An Apology to the NESEA Community

I want to sincerely apologize to the NESEA community. Nine months ago, I wrote a harsh post about last years NESEA conference that has justifiably received some negative feedback.

Here’s the truth; I love NESEA. I find the community an absolute inspiration and as a young 24 year old, a full third of my life I’ve been coming to the NESEA show. There is no question in my mind that the green building, renewable energy, and cleantech industries in the Northeast –and thus, in some sense the entire U.S. — would not be what it is today was it not for the dedicatation, hard work and diligence of the NESEA community over the past couple decades. Many of my favorite, life changing jobs, mentors, and knowledge about the most up-to-date building techniques have come from the NESEA show. I’ve always be in awe of, and amazed at the depth of knowledge of NESEA professionals.

I didn’t start writing because I thought I was a good writer, had some amazing new ideas to share, or because I have a huge ego. I simply starting blogging to connect with people who share the same passion as I do, so we can do something about it. I never meant to offend or anger anyone and for this I’m sorry.

The experience has taught me that words are powerful and someone is always watching. You can be critical with your writing, but you really need to mean it and can’t be sloppy. In the end, I will be more careful.

As a look forward, I have one goal. One of my initial frustrations with NESEA was the lack of awareness young people had about the community. Instead of uselessly complaining about it, my plan is start working on it. Getting the young, rising stars involved in the community. I know that some of them are, but I think more should be, and can be. I plan to use this blog as a place to do that, to share ideas, and get feedback. Who knows how it will go, but we’ll see.

I look forward to sharing ideas, collaborating with each other, and helping grow the next generation of the NESEA community.

-Chris

Developing more scientists, engineers is goal of $17 million U.S. Army grant to Virginia Tech Consortium

BLACKSBURG, Va. — For years the U.S. Army has worked to entice schoolchildren to develop interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).  Under a $17.2 million grant, Virginia Tech and partners will determine which programs work best not only in training teachers but also for children from fifth grade up.

Competitions, internships, mentoring, and science fairs are among the high-profile Army-sponsored STEM activities. For instance, the Junior Solar Sprint, orchestrated by NESEA, teaches middle school age students about scientific inquiry; properties of materials; photovoltaic cells; forces and motion; electricity and magnetism; ratios and geometry, and craftsmanship all through a uniquely crafted competition – design, build, and race the most innovative, speedy model solar electric car you can!

“It would be great to know if that middle-school child who worked on a solar electric car went on to become a math teacher or a corporate physicist or a Department of Defense engineer,” says Vice President for Outreach and International Affairs John Dooley. “Training teachers and fostering public-school education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics is part of Virginia Tech’s strategic plan, and this grant taps into our expertise to help develop that workforce.”

Workforce concerns rise from a projected shortfall in scientists and engineers, both at the Department of Defense and throughout the nation. The Army Educational Outreach Program piques student interest early, enticing more college students to choose STEM disciplines. Under Virginia Tech’s leadership, three important milestones will occur: marketing, data collection, and measurement.

“The U.S. Army has long recognized that a scientifically and technologically literate citizenry is our nation’s best hope for a secure, rewarding, and successful future,” says Ashley Wade, youth science program manager in the Army Research Laboratory’s Army Research Office. “For more than 50 years, the Army has supported a wide range of educational opportunities in STEM for our youth and their teachers. We are excited to partner with Virginia Tech and other consortium members to enhance and grow our STEM education outreach programs.”

Virginia Tech offices working under the three-year grant are Continuing and Professional Education, which is leading the project; the Office of Academic Assessment; and the university’s VT-STEM initiative.

Consortium partners are:

  • The University of New Hampshire’s Leitzel Center, which operates a strong Teach-the-Teacher program and other STEM initiatives
  • George Washington University, which will have responsibility for four STEM programs including math-and-science internships in Army laboratories for students in grades seven to 12
  • Junior Technical Engineering Society, which runs summer programs called UNITE for economically disadvantaged high-school students interested in engineering
  • Academy of Applied Science, which will be responsible for four STEM programs including eCybermission
  • Northeast Sustainable Energy Association, which runs the Junior Solar Sprint

Dilbert needs NESEA

In case you missed it, below is the speech I gave at the 2010 NESEA Annual meeting.

Thank you, Jennifer, for your kind words.  Let me say it has been a pleasure working with Jennifer over the last year.  It excites me to think about how much the organization has jelled in the last year and how much potential we have in the years to come.  This is all due to the hard work of Jennifer and the staff.

I’d also like to thank NESEA Rhode Island, and in particular John Jacobson for setting up the event, lining up a fantastic speaker, and being a gracious host.   Thank you very much.

Jennifer gave you a great overview of the changes that have taken place over the past year.  If you read the annual report, I mentioned some changes we made at the board level that tie in nicely.  However, I want to spend the next few minutes talking to you about NESEA’s mission and how we measure whether we’ve achieved the mission or not.    Our mission is stated as: NESEA advances the adoption of sustainable energy practices in the built environment.

So what tells us when we’ve achieved our mission?

I recently read an article in the in the Wall Street Journal, written by Dilbert creator Scott Adams.  Scott lives in California, and wrote the article to explain the process he went through to build a “green” home.

Before I read a portion of the article, here is Scott’s definition of “green”: I think of it as living the life you want, with as much Earth-wise efficiency as your time and budget reasonably allow.

Here’s what Scott had to say in the article:

Let’s say you love the Earth. You see an article in a magazine about a guy who built a “green” house using mostly twigs, pinecones and abandoned bird nests. You want to build a green home, too. So you find an architect, show him the magazine and say, “Give me one just like this.”

Good luck with that.

Your architect only knows how to design homes using materials that his local planning commission is likely to approve. But he wants the job, so he tries hard to talk you out of using twigs, pinecones and abandoned bird nests. He tells you that no builder will build it. He tells you it won’t get approved by the city. He tells you it won’t stand up to earthquakes, hurricanes or termites. But you persist. You’re saving the Earth, damn it. No one said it would be easy.

So the architect—and later your building engineer, too—each asks you to sign a document saying you won’t sue them when beavers eat a load-bearing wall and your entire family is crushed by forest debris. You make the mistake of mentioning this arrangement to your family, and they leave you. But you are not deterred because you’re saving the planet, damn it. You’ll get a new family. A greener one.

Your next hurdle is the local planning commission. They like to approve things that are similar to things they’ve approved before. To do otherwise is to risk unemployment. And the neighbors don’t want to live next to a house that looks like a compost pile. But let’s say, for the sake of this fascinating story, that everyone in the planning commission is heavily medicated with medical marijuana and they approve your project over the objections of all of your neighbors, except for the beavers, who are suspiciously flexible. Now you need a contractor who is willing to risk his career to build this cutting-edge structure.

Good luck with that.

No builder wants a risky project that could end his career. And how would he price it? He’d have to learn a whole new building method and find subcontractors willing to take on the risk. Amazingly, after a long search, you find a builder who is willing to tackle the project for about 25% more than the cost of a traditional house frame, which is reasonable given the extra business uncertainties. You’re OK with the extra costs because you’re saving the Earth, damn it.

Against all odds, you get the house built. But you can’t figure out why your monthly energy bill is the same as your neighbor’s. That magazine article assured you that twigs, pinecones and bird nests are excellent insulators. Where did you go wrong?

Here’s a person, Scott Adams, who, I’m going to assume, has more resources than most of us in the room and he’s detailing his excruciatingly painful process of trying to do the right thing and build what he considers a green home.  If it’s this difficult, we’ll never see widespread adoption.  Reading this article made me think.  Would his experience have been any better if he had simply lived within NEASEA territory?  Doubtful. Would the process have been better if he or his architect were an active NESEA member?  Went to BE regularly and had a network of other NESEA members to rely on?  Absolutely.

That, in real terms, is what NESEA is all about.  It’s about bringing that architect, the builder, the planning committee member together.  It’s sitting them down and saying, we’ve seen this technique a hundred times, and it works.  You need to start using this technique in your designs, building with these materials and approving these methods.  This is clear to those of you that have been active NESEA members for years.

The connecting piece between our mission and this story is that Scott Adams lives in California and didn’t know that NESEA exists to reach out to.  That’s the fulfillment of our mission: reaching out to more and more people with our knowledge and helping spread sustainable building practices.  I’m not saying that we, the NORTHEAST Sustainable Energy Association, need to have a chapter in California, but rather that I think our focus needs to be on making NESEA a recognized leader in sustainable energy practices — so that, next time, a lost dreamer in California knows to call the northeast for help.   Once we’ve reached that level, I’ll know we’ve achieved our mission.  This isn’t an easy task, but I hope you’ll ALL join me by becoming a member, donating or volunteering your time.  As a group I know we can make a sustainable future a reality.