Net-Zero Energy & High Performance Building Presentations, Nov. 10, 2011

Curious about zero net energy and high performance buildings?

Ever wonder how zero net energy is possible?

Interested in net zero/high performance building design and mechanical systems?

Join us November 10th at the Mitsubishi Training Center in Southborough, MA to find out! RSVP HERE.

Our hosts and sponsors Mitsubishi Electric have helped us pull together a fantastic evening.

Registration, networking and hors d’oeuvres begin at 5PM
The talks will begin at 6PM, followed by Q&A

Moderating the evening’s discussion (and also sharing more information about NESEA’s Zero Net Energy Building Award) will be Mike Duclos, a principal and founder of The DEAP Energy Group, LLC, a consultancy providing a wide variety of Deep Energy Retrofit, Zero Net Energy and Passive House related consulting services.

Mike is a HERS Rater with Mass. New Homes with ENERGY STAR program, a Building Science Certified Infrared Thermographer, a Certified Passive House Consultant who certified the second Passive House in Massachusetts, holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from UMass Lowell, and two patents. See more from Mike at the DEAP Energy Group website.

Our speakers are R. Carter Scott, President of Transformations, Inc., a sustainable development and building company in Townsend, MA and William Maclay, founding principal of Maclay Architects in Waitsfield, VT. Both have extensive experience with net zero and high performance building design and the technology that makes net zero possible.

R. Carter Scott will talk about several of his recent zero energy homes built throughout Massachusetts, focusing on how to get to zero on a reasonable budget, including how to get the most out of current incentives for solar electric systems.

Transformations, Inc. specializes in developing and building Zero-Energy communities, building out Zero-Energy communities for other developers, building custom Zero-Energy homes and installing solar electric systems for residential, commercial and building clients. Have a look at his work over on the Transformations, Inc. website!

William (Bill) Maclay will talk about the process for achieving net zero energy in institutional and commercial buildings, sharing his experiences on two of his firm’s recent projects and his approach from design to monitoring will illuminate how to achieve net zero energy and operate at net zero energy.

Maclay Architects is an awards winning architectural practice that specializes in environmental planning, healthy building design, energy conservation and net-zero architecture. Their own offices are solar powered and net-zero, even in central Vermont! Maclay Architects most recent projects can be found on their website.

CEUs are pending through the AIA. AIA accredited sessions are also often eligible for self-reporting for other licenses or certifications.

Here is the essential info:
What: Net-Zero Energy & High Performance Building Presentations, hosted and sponsored by Mitsubishi Electric
When: November 10th, 2011  - starting 5PM (talks starting at 6PM)
Where: Mitsubishi Training Center, 150 Cordaville Rd., Southborough, MA 01772
How? RSVP HERE or contact 413.774.6051 ext. 20, or rheldt@nesea.org

And yes… it’s free. Get excited.

Reminder: UMass Amherst Lecture Series

NESEA member public presentations

If you visited some residences at Green Buildings Open House this past weekend and were looking for some more information or next steps, you may want to check out NESEA member Rachel White’s (of Greener Every Day) talk at the Chelmsford Public Library.

Her talk is part of a two part series “Bringing Your Home into the 21st Century“. The first part of this series (delivered Sept. 21) was presented by Paul Eldrenkamp (of Byggmeister, Inc.), long-time NESEA member and this year’s BuildingEnergy Conference co-chair. (Sorry we missed your talk, Paul! We’ll just have to check out your talk “Ice Dams, Climate Change & You” at the Weston Public Library Oct. 19th, or your session at Build Boston Nov. 16th !)

Bringing Your Home into the 21st Century
presented by Rachel White, Greener Every Day, LLC
Wednesday, October 26th, 7PM
Chelmsford Public Library
25 Boston Rd., Chelmsford, MA

For other upcoming events, check out our events calendar – and as always, if you have an event you would like to promote, just let us know (nesea@nesea.org)!

Executive Director's Report — NESEA Annual Meeting, Sept. 24, 2011

Here are the remarks I delivered at the annual meeting on Saturday night, for those of you who weren’t able to join us. It was a great gathering!

“Welcome everybody to the 2011 annual meeting of the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association.

It feels really appropriate to me that this year’s annual meeting is happening here, in New York City. Clearly, New York is a hub for sustainable energy practice in the Northeast, and our New York City Chapter, GreenHome NYC is a shining example of that. GreenHomeNYC is one of our most active chapters, and in addition to hosting us for this annual meeting, they have a huge number of events on the docket this fall – including the blow out NEW New York Block Party Shai just described.

Any of you who read the September 2011 edition of Scientific American know that the future of our country – indeed our world – is urban. Projections say that nearly 70 percent of the global population will be urban by 2050. Cities face huge challenges, but they are also engines of the type of innovation that will be necessary for us to create a sustainable future.

Finally, as I’ll share with you later in my remarks, one of NESEA’s key initiatives for 2012 will involve “expanding the choir” – in other words, dramatically increasing the number of people we reach in order to serve our mission, which is to advance the adoption of sustainable energy solutions in the built environment. As an organization with deep roots in Red Sox territory, one of the most logical ways for us to do that is to expand our geographic reach into the southern part of our 10-state region, starting with New York City. And so tonight I am delighted to call myself a Yankees fan, and even more delighted to be here in NYC.

I want to spend a bit of time tonight telling you where we’ve been over the past year, and where we’re headed. But before I do that, a few “thank yous” are in order:

First, I would like to thank the Institute for Sustainable Cities for hosting us. We are delighted to have such a wonderful and centrally located place for our meeting, and are very grateful for your involvement. I would also like to thank Green Mountain Energy for their sponsorship of this event. Sponsorship for our annual meeting is a relatively new thing, and we greatly appreciate your support, as well as that of our other sponsors throughout the year.

Most of all, thank you to GreenHomeNYC – and in particular to Lifetime NESEA member Andy Padian, NESEA Board Member Steven Lenard, and GreenHome Executive Director Shai Lauros for the phenomenal job you have done putting together this amazing annual meeting on a shoestring budget, and a day’s worth of activities to make it worth any NESEA member’s while to travel here to the meeting. I have a small gift for each of you as a token of our appreciation.

Now, a quick review of the past year. At last year’s annual meeting I shared with you that we had just adopted a strategic plan. Just a year later, we have implemented almost all of what was in that plan. Here’s a brief snapshot of what’s happened within the past year.

We spent much of the past year focused on new partnerships. As many of you probably know, NESEA’s mission is to advance the adoption of sustainable energy solutions in the built environment. But nobody ever said that we needed to accomplish this mission alone. We have adopted a philosophy of “coopetition” – one of my favorite made-up words – under which we have actively sought out like-minded organizations, and in some cases competitors, to help us meet our goals. We identified several organizations that share parts of our mission, and that can help us spread the word to meet it more effectively.

For example, within the past few months we have struck a deal with the Boston Society of Architects to deliver a track of seminars at their Build Boston conference in November. It’s a great opportunity for us to get the good work of the NESEA community in front of a broader audience, and for that audience, which is clamoring for more information on sustainability, to sample some very high quality sessions.

We also collaborated with the German Consulate and the Upper Austria Trade Commission to bring BE conference attendees cutting-edge products and information from Europe. We hope to expand this relationship and to invite other countries to participate in BE, to make it an international hub for networking and learning about best practices in sustainable energy in the Northeast.

Closely related to these types of partnerships, we also spent time last year shoring up relationships with longtime NESEA supporters and sponsors, and cultivating new ones. We attracted support from 14 new sponsors in 2011. Although we continue to operate in an extremely challenging economic environment, we are optimistic that we will be able to work closely with these organizations to provide them with the value they need to justify deepening their support of (and involvement with) NESEA.

We also spent a lot of time last year figuring out how chapters could best help us meet our mission, and what we could offer them in return. We invited NESEA chapters to work with us to develop a new chapter structure, and seven agreed to do so. We will be working with these chapters in the coming year to provide clearer, more consistent branding and programming that advances our mutual missions.

BuildingEnergy11 received rave reviews. We tried a lot of new things, including a full day educators’ summit, which attracted 100 people, and a second plenary session, the Women of Green, which was one of the high points of the conference. We held our own with respect to attendance in an economic climate in which other conferences were hemorrhaging – attracting nearly 4,000 professionals and 150 exhibitors to the conference.

Our Green Buildings Open House program held its own as well, attracting nearly 500 host sites and 12,000 visitors to learn about sustainable energy solutions in a variety of residential and commercial buildings, both new and retrofitted. Just last week, I heard an incredibly inspiring story from one of our hosts, Max Horn, who lives in Hull, MA. Max attended the tour for several years, and was finally inspired to build his own high performance home a few years ago. And now it’s his mission to educate others to do the same, with all that he’s learned from the NESEA community. Talk about a program with real world impact!

So what’s next for NESEA? I alluded to it before.

For more than 30 years the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association (NESEA) has been a membership organization that has appealed to a relatively small audience of professionals and consumers interested in promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency through varying means – advocacy, consumer education, professional development, and networking chief among them.

Over time, as the sustainable energy field has become more saturated, we have narrowed our mission and our focus. Our mission is to advance the adoption of sustainable energy practices in the built environment, and we meet it primarily by connecting professionals to each other, to ideas and to consumers.

With only 1,000 members, and 4,000 BuildingEnergy Conference attendees each year, we have been preaching to a small choir, given the huge need for sustainable energy solutions in the Northeastern United States.

It’s time to expand the choir dramatically. We need to expand geographically, by doing a better job of serving our community outside of New England. We need to expand from a generational perspective, making sure we’re welcoming the next generation of practitioners into the fold, and learning from them. And, perhaps most importantly, we need to expand to reach audiences who may not yet “get” that sustainability is a business imperative.

How will we do that?

First, through an increased focus on our current members and our potential members. We’ve been surveying our community to see what’s important to them in a membership organization. And frankly, there aren’t a lot of surprises in their answers. Turns out that what they value in NESEA is real, vetted solutions, access to multidisciplinary professionals, and chances to interact and share with one another in person. So we’ll be working to create more such opportunities, largely by providing better support to our chapters. Within the next year, we’ll work with our most active chapters to develop and promote at least 6 local programs that help them serve NESEA members at the local level. The first of these is already scheduled for Nov. 10th in Southborough MA, and will be hosted by NESEA business member Mitsubishi. It will be NESEA’s first ever joint chapter networking meeting, and will feature an information session on “getting to zero” and on NESEA’s Zero Net Energy Building Award. We hope to draw members from Springfield and Boston, MA, the Cape, Rhode Island and New Hampshire.

We will also be working to create an infrastructure for collaboration. One of the primary tools for this will be the NESEA website. Yes, we’ve heard your feedback over the years, and we know it sucks. I am happy to report that I’ve just been given the board’s blessing to replace it with a cleaner, easier-to-use website that will better help you, as members of our community, find each other, show your good work, and find the resources you need to do more sustainable energy work better.

Finally, we’ll be working this year to expand BE beyond three days per year in Boston. For starters, we are testing a BE Masters Series of online courses, taught by BuildingEnergy presenters, to take fuller advantage of the wonderful content generated at BE year round and to allow those who might be geographically challenged to participate. We also plan to create a speakers bureau of BE presenters who are willing to deliver their seminars in various locations throughout NESEA territory, in conjunction with chapter meetings or other events. Ultimately – and this may be part of the multi-year plan – we hope to create a year-round on-line BE community, moderated by BE planning committee members to encourage continuous learning and connection – and possibly a BE South Conference, to be held somewhere in the NYC area.

As you can see, we have some very ambitious plans. But at its root, NESEA is a member-driven community. All of this must happen for the members, and be driven largely by the members. So if any of what you have heard resonates with you, I invite you to get involved. If you’re not already a member, join NESEA. If you are a member, attend the Building Energy Conference, exhibit there, sponsor. Even better, help shape our content by joining the planning committee for the BuildingEnergy Conference or the BE Masters Series. Register your most recent project for our Green Buildings Open House tour each year in October. Enter your best work in NESEA’s Zero Net Energy Building Award to compete for our annual $10,000 prize. Submit an article for publication in our Northeast Sun magazine. Make this organization a true reflection of the excellent work you are doing to advance sustainable energy practices in the built environment.

I hope you’ve gotten a good feel for where we’ve been over the past year, and for where we’re headed. In a few minutes I’m going to call NESEA board chair, James Petersen to the stage. James has been a huge champion of our work to “expand the choir,” and has supported these efforts personally by being a NESEA evangelist within his own professional network. James will share his thoughts with you on how to get involved with NESEA, and why it’s imperative that you do so.

But before I call James to the stage, I’d like to close with a short video, in which some of our members themselves make a compelling case for why membership matters. This video was shot and produced for us, pro bono, at BE11 by Roger Sorkin, of Sorkin Productions, to whom we are incredibly grateful.

Thank you again for your time!”

Great News from the Membership!

Long-time NESEA Members Kuhn Riddle Architects (KRA) based in Amherst, MA  have recently earned LEED Platinum (New Construction) certification, in conjunction with Arrowwood Construction (also of Amherst, MA)  for their work on New England Environmental’s headquarters (NEE.)

According to their press release, a sampling of the building’s energy New England Environmental (Kuhn Riddle Architects)specs include a 39,000 kW photovoltaic array (installed by other long-time NESEA members PV Squared), 12” thick walls (2×6 and 2×4 with a 3” thermal break) filled with 12” cellulose insulation (recycled material), and 24” of cellulose insulation for the ceilings. And for one more additional member shout-out – Solectria Renewables products were used!

While LEED certifications seem to be popping up all over, Andy Grogan of KRA comments,

“[the project] shows how local professionals and an engaged community can create a project that achieves levels of energy efficiency that too often feel out-of-reach for commercial projects without substantial budgets…For this project, the architects (Kuhn Riddle), most consultants, and the contractor/subcontractors were all local.  Many were educated here at UMASS Amherst.  And as the client will tell you, this project did not cost an arm-and-a-leg to construct, but it achieves remarkable levels of energy efficiency.”

Moreover, as John Kuhn (one of the lead architects on the project) noted, the integration of PV into the building was not an afterthought, but rather part of the process all along. Jon Child of PV Squared also mentioned the collaborative design process – for example, that the architects went for a long, rectangular roof  to accommodate the solar panels.

This type of collaboration is a  perfect example of the kinds of conversations that should be happening between builders and designers and renewable energy installers to ensure that all the systems work together seamlessly. Jon Child commented on how essential it is to have the systems in communication with one another, otherwise things fall apart – for example the HVAC needs to be in conversation with the renewables which needs to be in conversation with the overall design. This is, I’m sure, very basic to NESEA member thinking, but it’s always nice to hear about it in practice! I know when I hear about LEED failures, I find myself wondering, “Where was the communication?”

On that note, we complain a great deal within the NESEA community about having LEED buildings without LEED people. But, as it turns out, the people at New England Environmental are LEED people! They have about a year’s worth of data (you can see their PV performance here – as linked to their website), as the construction was complete last year, and they embody how LEED residents  make LEED successful. According to John Kuhn (of KRA), Julie Marcus (of NEE) truly spearheaded the LEED process. As New England Environmental is an environmental consulting firm, they wanted to use their headquarters as a lab for what they do and were instrumental in achieving many of the landscaping site points. Another exciting detail is that this was the first LEED project for John Kuhn and Ann Marshall of KRA and for their contractors. Thanks to their excellent collaboration and support from NEE, this project was successful.

You can view some of the photos and more information at the Kuhn Riddle website here and here, and more detail of the PV installation and array here (also linked above).

Even better, you can visit the building yourself on October 1st, as New England Environmental HQ is part of our Green Buildings Open House event!

Our warmest congratulations (and a high five) to Kuhn Riddle Architects, to everyone who worked on the project (way to go PV Squared!), and to New England Environmental.

Hey Members! Do you also have news to share? Let me know! Highlighting your good work is why we are here. Contact me at 413.774.6051 ext. 20, or rheldt@nesea.org.

…And we’re still accepting host sites for GBOH, so if you have a high-performance or otherwise energy efficient building, contact Michelle Rose at 413.774.6051 ext. 17 or mrose@nesea.org.

Annual Meeting 2011

You’re invited to this year’s

Hosted by GreenHome NYCSeptember 24, 2011
CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities
at Hunter College
(rm. W714, enter at SW corner)
68th & Lexington (6 train @ 68th/Lex)
NYC, NY
5pm to 9pm.

Our Annual Meetings are always great opportunities to meet up with other NESEA members and supporters for networking and engagement, and this year’s is no exception. We’re excited to be holding this gathering in Manhattan, with our great chapter GreenHomeNYC. We are also extremely grateful to CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities for the excellent meeting space.

The schedule of events is as follows:

  • 5pm – registration, meet & greet (with hors d’oeuvres)
  • 6pm – conversations with CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities & GreenHomeNYC about their organizations and upcoming projects/events. We will also be hearing about recent job experiences in a similar format to GreenHomeNYC’s green jobs forum.
  • 7pm – address from NESEA’s Executive Director, Jennifer Marrapese and from NESEA’s Board Chair, James Petersen (of Petersen Engineering)
  • 7:30pm – Our Keynote Speaker, Mr. Projjal Dutta will give his talk “Taking the Car out of Carbon” (detailed below)

There will also be time for Q&A and more networking from 8:30 – 9PM

Mr. Projjal Dutta, Director of Sustainability for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Through his extensive professional background and his present work with the MTA, Mr. Dutta has witnessed great improvements in the energy performance of buildings,  a figure which ignores the often enormous amount of energy required to transport people and goods to and from buildings.  His talk, “Taking the Car out of Carbon” will address the energy impacts of transportation and how they can be improved.

Also speaking at this year’s meeting will be Carina Molnar of  the CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities (ISC). She will be speaking about ISC’s City Atlas New York, which is an innovative, bottom-up sustainability plan that provides everyday citizens with a platform to design, discuss, and participate in new ideas for New York City.

If you already RSVP’d and if you’re down in the city on Saturday morning/afternoon and need something to do before the Annual Meeting,

  • Chris Benedict, NESEA member and internationally renowned designer of extremely high performance affordable housing, will personally take you through her latest building under construction in the Bronx. Space is limited, so please let us know if you would like to join this tour.
  • Andrew Padian, NESEA member & champion, will be giving a tour of the Clinton Community Garden on W48th St. between 9th & 10th Ave., a sanctuary mere blocks from Times Square, also starting at 1pm.  Please let us know you would like to attend, as space is limited.
  • GreenHomeNYC has organized a self-guided tour of the Highline (W30th at 10th Ave) starting at 1pm.

Again, please note these tours are open to those who have RSVP’d to the Annual Meeting and you will receive the details once you have done so.

I hope you can join us for this exciting event. Here’s the event info, one more time:

NESEA 2011 Annual Meeting
September 24, 2011
5pm to 9pm
CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities at Hunter College
Lexington Avenue and 68th Street
New York City, NY

Get Directions (Option A on map)

REGISTRATION IS CLOSED AS OF 9/23/11

(Because of security at Hunter, you MUST RSVP to attend;
if your name is not on the list, you won’t be admitted.)

GreenHome NYC

The Institute for Sustainable Cities

Report from our traveling quartet from Saxony and Upper Austria

Tom Hartman, Chris Benedict, Andy Shapiro, and I are in the midst of a 2-week tour of high performance buildings in Saxony and Upper Austria. We’ll be presenting our findings during three sessions at Building Energy. Here’s a very quick taste of some of the things we’ve seen.

Andy, Chris, and Tom talking with architect Gunter Lassy at the offices of Lassy Architects in Linz, Austria. Gunter represents the 4th generation in his family to work at the 18-person firm. Gunter’s not sold on Passive House, having tried it. But, based on weather trends over the last 10 summers or so in Linz, he’s getting really worried about the region’s ability to handle increased cooling loads.

Sunset view of part of Solar Village, a 5-year-old development on the outskirts of Linz; Lassy Architects designed some of the apartment blocks in this development. Built to Passive House standards (as defined by the Austrians, anyway — there’s an interesting conversation in and of itself), actual performance data shows a very broad range of energy usage, with some units consuming as much as five times the energy as other, similar units. Bottom line: If you leave the windows open all winter in a high-performance building, it becomes a low-performance building. Who’d have thought?

A view of a delightful Kindergarten in the tiny Austrian village of Schneegattern. One of the first schools in Austria inspired by Passive House strategies, it uses wood pellets for heating. Our host Herbert Nagl told me, “We believe in investing heavily in our children here.”

Here Chris, Tom, and Andy admire the underground wood pellet storage in the school’s backyard. To get a view of just what they’re looking at in there, you’ll have to come to our March 9th sessions.

Herbert also showed us the community music school. Here’s where the village’s two volunteer wind ensembles practice (the town has two bands, five fire brigades, and 4800 citizens). This is a photo of a music stand — note the beer glass holder. Herbert said the typical practice regimen for the bands consists of 2 hours of rehearsing and 6 hours of drinking beer, with considerable overlap between the two activities, apparently. Nonetheless, the local bands fare very well in regional competitions.

Q & A with Kate Goldstein, NESEA member and Emerging Professional

Kate Goldstein, NESEA member, BE11 Planning Committee Member and current PhD candidate in engineering at MIT

Today we’re talking to Kate Goldstein, a young NESEA member from Providence, RI, and a PhD candidate at MIT, about how she came to be involved with the organization and what NESEA has meant to her professionally and personally. This is part one of a two part conversation with Kate (pictured, right). In part two, she’ll talk about her efforts on behalf of Emerging Professionals at the BuildingEnergy Conference.

As always, we hope these Q & As will provide you with some insights about what you can expect from this year’s conference and the people who are making it happen.

Q: What are you studying at MIT, Kate?
A: Very broadly I study energy in buildings. I am in the Building Technology graduate program which is housed in the architecture department but is essentially a cross between a traditional mechanical engineering and architectural engineering department. Most of my class-work, and the core of my research, is in heat transfer and fluid mechanics.

Q: How did you first come to know about/hear about NESEA?
A: My earliest email concerning NESEA is dated early March of 2008, which was right before the BuildingEnergy Conference during my junior year of college at Brown University. Kurt Teichert introduced me to NESEA, and the NESEA community.

Kurt is a professor at Brown in the Environmental Studies department, and he was the first person to get me passionate about energy in buildings. I am actually quite indebted to him, since when I entered his classroom I wasn’t quite sure where I was going or where I belonged. Kurt always stresses to his students the importance of developing relationships within the field. He strongly encourages networking and grounding oneself in the community around what you do. In my couple of semesters with him at Brown I attended two BuildingEnergy conferences and one Greenbuild conference and met a wide network of local community members in Providence who were really implementing what we talked about it the classroom.

Q: What are you gaining from your association with NESEA?
A: That’s a pretty loaded question and the simplest answer is that NESEA makes me really happy. I am on the planning committee for the BuildingEnergy Conference and I can honestly say that I have not regretted one moment of time I have spent there. I have had the opportunity to meet the best and brightest and funniest and warmest in the field from all over the Northeast. I have been given the great gift of feeling appreciated; whatever I do for NESEA, large or small, I am thanked by a network from NESEA staff to architects, engineers, builders, business people, and so many more. This is one of the most gratifying feelings as my everyday life is fairly stressful, and research is a long road that requires a lot of patience and a lot of tolerance for confusion. I get whatever I give at NESEA. I can’t say that about any other organization for which I’ve worked.

Q: You wrote an article for Northeast Sun recently. What made you decide to write it, and what was it about?
A: I wrote the article because of what I saw personally in the field, and what I heard talked about time and again at NESEA: the great barrier in communication between architects and engineers. At the time, I was living with and dating an architect, and we were thus living the “crossing of the streams”. I thought I could offer an interesting perspective about the importance of giving all you had to making things work. From learning to listen, to learning to be patient, to learning to be able to see the world through someone else’s eyes.

I think the Sun is a great magazine, but I would really love to see more personal essays and articles within it so that the rest of NESEA can be exposed to the amazing people I have the opportunity to work with and talk to every day.

(In part two next Wednesday, Kate talks about Emerging Professionals at the BuildingEnergy Conference.)

Review of Green Building Product Certifications: Getting What You Need

REVIEW OF:

Green Building Product Certifications: GETTING WHAT YOU NEED
Published by BUILDINGGREEN, 2011
Principal Author: Jennifer Atlee
Contributors: Nadav Malin and Tristan Roberts
Cost: $79

BY JOE HASKETT

Like the main protagonist in the movie “Six Degrees of Separation” – where making connections is key in order to advance oneself – many product manufacturers today are making claims of greater connectedness to being green than is warranted.  The definition of ‘green’ is constantly changing, and when worded in just the right way, can translate into greater profits for business and big problems for consumers.  Are we to settle for a confusing variety of certifications that subtly offer false shades of green at the expense of our environment?

Luckily the answer is no. Thanks to a new report published by BuildingGreen and titled,  Green Building Product Certifications: Getting What You Need, we now have a resource to evaluate the real story of green product certification. This report offers up detailed explanations of the many certifications available, how they were developed and the criteria they use to evaluate their products.

The report helps to dispel the notion of a wild-west when dealing with Green Certifications. It offers an overview of how to spot ‘green-washing’ (they define it 9 ways), why certifications are important, who to trust and underscores the need to continually focus on what really matters. Its overall objective is to “provide a no-nonsense guide to the world of green building product certifications to help designers, purchasers, manufacturers and others in the industry to focus on what is significant and relevant so that market focus can work and the industry can focus on bigger issues.” In my opinion they have succeeded.

In terms of set up, the report follows a sensible logic: Overview, Product Certifications, Certification by Building Sector (CSI) and an explanation as to what we can expect to see in the future. Most of the report, not surprisingly, is devoted to product certifications. It covers a whole host of standards pertaining to Energy Performance, Water Efficiency, Embodied Carbon, and Forestry Certification – to name a few. For a typical snapshot of the report, take the example of one of the more critical areas for environmental performance: Energy Performance. The report gives a brief synopsis of the issue(s) and delves into each of the standards and/or certifications available. Of these standards – Energy Star, Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE), EnerGuide and EnergyGuide, each are given summaries, important data points such as a company website, the managing organization, launch date and the type of products they certify. It is then concluded with what the report refers to as, “BuildingGreen’s Quick Take” – an unadulterated snapshot of information that only the long-standing reputation and collective knowledge of BuildingGreen could provide. It balances the reports tight professional tone with a little water cooler chat. For example, in the ‘Quick Take’ for Energy Star, it offers this: “Energy Star was embarrassed in 2010 by audits showing that it relied on questionable data, but it has been convincingly cleaning up its act. The label is a well-recognized logo and a basic certification for manufacturers seeking to promote the energy efficiency of their products. Energy Star typically aims to cover the top 25% of products in any given sector, so it’s a great start, but buyers interested in the highest-rated products may want to look to more stringent standards like CEE.”

The report goes on to look at certifications through another lens; by building product sector. It is an attempt, as the report states, “to provide an initial overview of the key issues for each building category for which more widely applicable certifications may be helpful.” In the first section, it offers no current comprehensive certifications for Concrete, Masonry and Metals (CSI divisions 03, 04 and 05 respectively). It does, however, offer up potential third-party certifications for the percentage of recycled content or whether something is pre-consumer or post-consumer. It also speaks to the fact that this section – as with many others in the report – is a work in progress and the industry, as a whole, is attempting to provide more robust certifications that move across all sectors. It is not as robust as the Certifications Applicable to Any Building Product section, but it does make an attempt to offer up another way to discern complex certifications and replace it with an already established, well-known system utilized by people in the industry; MasterFormat.

Another credit to the report is the way it weaves ‘big picture’ thinking with detailed explanations of each certification. Among the well-researched product labels, acronyms and certifications, the report reminds us of our individual and collective responsibilities to continuously think holistically and not to focus on “certified products at the expense of cohesive, high-performance building design…as the environmental impact of a building over its lifetime is far greater than the sum of products therein.” It is this type of thinking that makes the report more comprehensive and not just a reference for label chasing.

The report concludes with a prediction that the number of green certifications and green product claims will continue to grow. It calls for more clarification and alignment amongst the certification class to help consumers and stakeholders avoid label confusion – while cautioning against a system that provides too much rigidity that could render itself incapable of improvement and not allow for the environmental-bar to be raised.

As the reader, you will walk away knowing the Who, What, When, Where and Why of Green Product Certifications. To be specific, you will learn the difference between VOC and SVOC, what ‘Thirteen-Fifty’ refers to and that Ecologo was acquired by UL and that UL will most likely be become one of the larger players within the certification world. You’ll also know the importance of understanding how first, second and third party affiliations impact the quality of certifications and how toxicity concerns are addressed by such certifications as Pharos, BASTA and ECCC. You will also learn how product certification can be a stepping stone to introducing Life-Cycle assessments (LCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPS’s) into your overall environmental IQ.

How would I rate this? I would give the report an 8 out 10 – with the caveat that there is always room for improvement. Not only would I recommend this report to my design colleagues, but I would – as the report suggests – recommend it to manufacturers and purchasers. I would also add business leaders and company executives to the list; they play a crucial role in the consumerist eco-system this report is trying to affect.

Any suggestions on how it could improve or what role it could play in the future? Sure. At $79 it is not cheap. For a larger company, it may be a bargain. However, for smaller companies and students it is not something easily procured. Furthermore, the graphic flow of the chapters and sub-chapters could use more distinguishing. Overall, it is well conceived and executed, but can often confuse the reader as to where they are within the document. As someone who sees this as a go-to reference guide, having something that makes it more clear to navigate through the 88 pages, would be a another point towards satisfaction. One last suggestion would be for GreenBuilding to announce that the report will be published at a standard interval – say every two years. If the future changes to the certifications world are anything like what the report offers up, it would make sense that the report’s content would need to be updated periodically allowing designers and others to keep a handle on what’s happening.

With this resource, those that are working towards continuing their knowledge base from which to make informed decisions regarding green products, this report will serve you well. We should also keep in mind that this is a passive tool that requires active understanding from the design community. The report mentions the honest confusion that design professionals have when dealing with ‘green’ certifications. It also mentions, inversely, an honest confusion on the manufacturer’s side to try and offer up products that meet our shifting definition of green. So, in the end the ball is moving for all sides and we would all be wise to work across disciplines to achieve our goals of environmental improvement.

KUDOS to BuildingGreen for once again pin-pointing an area of weakness within the environmental community and providing an answer. As we try to lessen our confusion and increase our understanding of the world of green products, we now have the first version of a Green Certifications Report that allows the degrees of separation to become closer and closer.

Next Steps: If You Build, Build to Net Zero

What? Builders saying that “architects know nothing about energy”? But I know some architects who definitely know A LOT about energy, especially the ones preparing the BuildingEnergy workshop, An Accessible Design Tool for Simplified Design Heat Loss and Energy Requirement Analysis for Single Family Structures. Here’s a peek into a recent email exchange about this workshop:

At 9:07 AM -0500 2/1/10, Everett Barber wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I’ve been showing our spreadsheet to various and sundry in preparation for the BE10 workshop.
All encounters with potential users have been very positive, even from one guy, a builder, who said that his clients rarely express any concern about energy. He thought this thing should be on the counter of every lumber yard in the US. Hmmm. That is so far beyond where we are now that I can’t even contemplate what that would entail on our end. The builder said that the architects he works with know ‘nothing’ about energy and really don’t seem to care. So my experience was not unique, even in this day.
Anyway, I thought I’d forward some comments that I got regarding the program from Tom Hopper. He’s an architect/teacher/industrial designer. I think that you know him. We spent about 2 hours on the phone on Sat. going over the program. He seems very positive about it and what it does. He said it is very useful as a self-teaching tool.
There is no way that I’ll be able to incorporate Tom’s suggestions by the BE10 workshop, but we’ll do our best. We are still developing our own passive solar ‘routines’ within the program so that we don’t have to go to back and forth between F-Chart to get the data that we need.
Onward.
Ev

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Thomas Hopper
Date: Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:34 AM
Subject: next idea
To: Everett Barber
Good morning Everett,

You know, I’ve got to tell you how pumped up I am about what you are doing; thinking about it all the time; such a good thing.

If I can encourage you, here is what I wish:

If you have recently visited my web site then I think that you can see that I’m getting ever more serious about approaching net zero for homes; like all the recently uploaded cabins, even the mini 12×12; I’m really trying to do this because the world needs to do this faster than we think.

So what if your Design Heat Loss program was subtitled “How to take serious steps toward net zero energy”?

Like my 24×28 solar cabin designed for two folks that I used in my trial run in your spread sheet; it is designed for high thermal capacitance, well valued and placed insulation for the entire envelope including doors and windows, substantial high R-5 glazing to the south and R-5.5 on all others, low glazing areas on all other orientations with only one tiny window on the north that facilitates natural convection cooling for summer along with the operable skylight on the north roof, it has good shading of glazing in summer with its stepped garrison style profile on the south. It has a 4.6kW array and three 3×7 thermal panels for DHW. These things are not trivial, once an intelligent orientation and envelope is done, they are absolutely needed steps to get to net zero.

I want to enter that data in your spread sheet model Home A, play with it, i.e. try different ideas in model Homes B & C and see trends, and I want to see how close I can get to zero energy usage; truly that is where I am permanently in all my design efforts for the rest of my life. Truly this is the tool we designers really need, the world needs, and I personally would use it a great deal. To me it is not enough to just conserve energy anymore; of course we must do it and your tool can educate along the way but this is not really enough.

Look I’m living what I say right now. Active solar really does work. We new this instinctively 35+ years ago. Now you have lots of raw data with 10,000 jobs to prove things.

I think this tool must allow these inputs.
If you can’t do it before NESEA, and I certainly understand that, then promise it in the next upgrade and tell the audience where your going with this.
This tool needs to embrace net zero energy goals right from the getgo/beginning or first introduction
; this is your hook to the world of architects and designers. This is where it must go. Indicate that this is where you are going. I strongly encourage you to not drop this objective for this super fine effort you are doing. Feel okay now that it is incomplete; you’ve got a great start. Let the audience taste the possibilities and potential, is what you’re doing at this NESEA BuildingEnergy10 Conference, but tell em where its going.

Go Ev Go!!! Wow! I am so excited by this possibility.

I will help you any way I can, to accomplish this greater goal. Perhaps we can use Adam’s skills along the way?

All the very best,

-Tom

PS – This am, tank at 103F at bottom and 107.5F at top, no wood burning. We have used 414kWh since start up of net meter. If it were Fran and I only here, we would be net zero on electric pretty sure. Got to do window insulation. I know somebody who did something ……