adobe photoshop cs upgrade crack Cheap Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended adobe flash player latest download 9.0.47.0 adobe flash reader Cheap Adobe After Effects CS4 adobe photoshop cs2 patterns 12 adobe cs2 illustrator keygen Cheap Adobe Contribute CS4 adobe after effects 4.1 serial free adobe illustrator download Cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 free adobe photoshop cs2 download adobe flash cs3 for mac Cheap Adobe Fireworks CS4 adobe photoshop 7.0 settings adobe photoshop cs3 final portable Cheap Adobe Flash CS4 Professional adobe photoshop starter edition adobe illustrator cs wow Cheap Adobe InCopy CS4 adobe illustrator dxf adobe illustrator cs2 minimum Cheap Adobe After Effects CS4 for Mac serial numbers for adobe photoshop cs3 adobe illustrator wik Cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 for Mac adobe flash player latest download 9.0.47.0 activation patch version 9.0 adobe photoshop Cheap Adobe Fireworks CS4 for Mac adobe after effects full adobe photoshop cs3 pdf tutorils Cheap Adobe Flash CS4 Professional for Mac crack adobe photoshop cs 8.0 adobe photoshop cs2 brush Cheap Adobe Illustrator CS4 for Mac buy adobe photoshop cs2 download adobe illustrator 10.0 free Cheap Adobe InCopy CS4 for Mac cracked for adobe photoshop software adobe flash driver Cheap Adobe InDesign CS4 for Mac serial adobe contribute cs3 adobe photoshop elements 5.0 cd-rom Cheap Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended for Mac adobe flash conversion to mpeg

NESEA Retrofit Revisited?

We’re having lots of great conversations internally about the strategic role of 50 Miles Street to NESEA.

For the uninitiated, “50 Miles Street” is the address of the NESEA building. Unlike many nonprofit organizations of our size, NESEA actually owns its building. We have owned it since the mid-1990s, as a result of an agreement with the City of Greenfield, MA, which also led to NESEA creating the Greenfield Energy Park.

From what I gather, people have been talking about making the building a showcase for energy efficiency and renewables for as long as we’ve owned it! Several members have initiated studies and made proposals as to what we should do, and in the mid-1990’s, the board even entertained completing a capital campaign to raise funds for a retrofit of the “Northeast Sustainability Center” at NESEA.

Lately, a number of NESEA members have again taken up the torch! Last fall, Nancy Hazard arranged for a comprehensive energy efficiency audit of the building, and since then NESEA board member John (JJ) Jacobson has completed a more comprehensive review, including:
• Reviewing all the previous studies of the building
• Talking with the city planner’s office and local businesses about anticipated economic development in Greenfield
• Reviewing the financials, including our utility and building maintenance expenses, our rental income vs. market rates, and other related information.

JJ is planning to present his findings to the NESEA board later this fall. The next step will likely be to establish a NESEA work group, comprised of board members, NESEA members and staff, to develop (and hopefully ultimately implement!) a strategic plan for the building.

So what’s your feedback. What would a Northeast Sustainability Center mean to you?


Name: Jennifer

Email:

This post was written by Jennifer Marrapese on August 23, 2010
Posted Under: Uncategorized

Reader Comments

What would a Northeast Sustainability Center mean to me?

That NESEA is finally considering walking its talk. But how is it possible that this has not been given highest priority until now?

And why is it that many progressive organizations are way behind conservative establishments when it comes to doing as they preach?

I recently quit teaching sustainable design and building at Yestermorrow in Warren VT, after 5 years of teaching up to 15 classes per year, because they refuse to become a smoke-free campus like more than 400 US colleges and hundreds of corporations and municipalities have already done – and as the US Military is working toward for 2013!!!!!

I’ve had to boycott SolarFest for the past five years for the same reason – they refuse to put health and safety above the (illusory) concern that it might exclude a class of people who deserve to be educated about living well while they choose to poison the air that others are forced to breathe.

Corporate America has been going “green” for some time, and NESEA is dragging its feet? What’s wrong with this picture?

#1 
Written By Robert Riversong on August 23rd, 2010 @ 19:51

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address